Have you thought about what will happen if we erase all gender distinctions in the law? That question is the basis of my recent Federalist article linked here: “How the Trans-Agenda Seeks to Redefine Everyone.”
I hope you’ll think it through too. Gender Identity is a term that is not meant to apply simply to a minority demographic. It is a term foisted upon everyone universally. Take a look at the following definition of gender identity, from the Employment Non-Discrimination Act:
The term ‘gender identity’ means the gender-related identity, appearance, or mannerisms or other gender-related characteristics of an individual, with or without regard to the individual’s designated sex at birth.
It's a new framing of what it means to be human, and it's about you whether you like it or not. Your sex is merely "designated" at birth, according to this legal definition. The erasure of gender distinctions is also meant to apply to reproductive rights, which means we are not supposed to assume that only women get pregnant. To understand how such language will change the relationships of the individual to the state, read on. The implications for state meddling in family and other relationships are vast. A brief excerpt here:
If we agree to change language to suit the transgender lobby, we ultimately agree to destroy in law the entire basis (sex distinctions) for the only union that can result in autonomously formed families. The implications for privacy and personal relationships are vast, and we need to understand that. If you think you’ll be able to cultivate and preserve strong personal relationships in this new matrix, you are mistaken. That can’t easily happen in a system in which your familial relationships are not acknowledged or respected by the State. This gender-neutral scheme obliterates the template for the family as a unit. And if the family is no longer accepted as a union that originates through the union of male and female, there is no real basis for the State to recognize any family as an autonomous unit. Without any such obligation, children become more easily classified as state property and our personal relationships are more easily controlled by the state. If that sounds totalitarian, that’s because it is.
Comments